The True Cost of Genetic Genealogy You probably wouldnt hand out your social security number without having a pretty good idea of how that information was going to be used right? (Kristen V. Brown) The text What DNA Testing Companies Terrifying Privacy Policies Actually Mean by Kristen Brown draws focus to the privacy policies of DNA testing companies. DNA is that part of the genetic code that is unique to each individual and is usually used for purposes of identification. The concept of DNA testing has gained wide acceptance though companies on their part have taken the advantage of peoples naivety to manipulate and share information without consent. Kristen succeeds in highlighting the underlying dark side of DNA testing companies privacy policies by relying heavily on logos and ethos. A logical fallacy is notable in one instance. The text is directed to the customers of DNA testing companies. The use DNA testing services again since there is massive breach and misuse of their private information. In summary Kristen Brown in the text What DNA Testing Companies Terrifying Privacy Policies Actually Mean succeeds in highlighting the hidden mischief behind DNA testing companies privacy policies. She capitalizes on logic by presenting screenshots from specific companys websites to refute claims made by their representatives. Additionally Kristen makes use of common items such as the social security number to remind the audience to always be cautious when sharing information just as it should be with their genetic information. However a logical fallacy is noticeable towards the end of the text. The author makes good use of ethos by using an authoritative tone in the text. The style and text structure is consistent with the rhetorical situation. Works Cited Kristen V. Brown. “What DNA Testing Companies? Terrifying Privacy Policies Actually Mean.” 18 Oct. 2017 gizmodo.com/what-dna-testing-companies-terrifying-privacy-policies-1819158337.
rhetorical analysis paper on this article gizmodo.com Other Requirements: The Paper must be between 1200-1700 words. You must include a works cited list with only ONE source remember you are analyzing one article. You are NOT writing a research paper here so you should only be working with one source here. You must provide both positive/negative comments about the article (e.g., while the author uses pathos well, it fails to use logos .etc.). You must use evidence to back up your claims (e.g., if you say the article uses pathos, provide specific examples and quotations that show this). Be sure to explain why your examples illustrate your point- remember ANALYZE! You must include a thesis, forecasting statement and incorporate M: MAIN IDEA E: EVIDENCE A: ANALYSIS L: LINK (either backward to the thesis or forward to the next paragraph). You must include at least one rhetorical fallacy in your analysis.