Sign In

Nickel and Dimed

Lastname FirstnameProfessor¬ís Name Course Title Date Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting by in America A majority of the people in America and indeed across the world believe that the homeless and the poor are the jobless and their survival is based on the little assistance that comes from the State. However through experience and writings of many authors this argument has been found to be untrue. Among such writers is Barbara Ehrenreich in her book Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting by in America. The purpose of this paper s to show why Ehrenreich’s argument about low-wage workers/low-wage employment a good and effective argument. Main Points of the Book Ehrenreich seeks insight into the many challenges that face the low wage workers. Among them are the hidden costs found in necessities like housing and food. She starts her book These acts are efforts to make her viewpoint more objective by avoiding real identity from manipulating the observations and testimonials of others which thoroughly uses throughout her work. Conclusion The above discussion provides a deep insight into the argument of Barbara Ehrenreich concerning the low-wage workers. Notable in the discussion is that the author effectively addresses the main points of the discussion with no bias or hidden assumptions. Also to make her work authoritative and affirm her points she makes use of numerous sources and statistics. Still she puts a lot of emphasis in disguising herself while to avoid any influence on the information she gets. Lastly this paper concludes the book is objective and the argument presented by the author is equally effective. Works Cited Ehrenreich Barbara. Nickel and dimed: On (not) getting by in America. Metropolitan Books 2010.
In a three-page (typed) essay, please provide a response to the topic below. You must compose your analysis in an argument essay format (i.e. third person voice, developed introduction, position thesis located at the end of the introduction, developed supporting points, counterarguments, transitions, original insight, evidence/support, quoted references to the text, a developed conclusion and proper grammar usage).


Question: Is Barbara Ehrenreich’s argument about low-wage workers/low-wage employment a good and effective argument?

Analyze and evaluate the strengths and/or weaknesses of Barbara Ehrenreich’s argument about low-wage workers/low-wage employment that she presents in Nickel and Dimed. Does Ehrenreich present a sound argument? How does she frame her argument? What is her viewpoint? Is her argument fair or biased? Please explain. If there are any biases, do they distract from the overall argument? Does she provide adequate factual evidence to support her claims? Hint: Examine the footnotes. Examine her use of observation/testimonials? Are her observations of others and their testimonials objective or manipulative? Are there any inferences, assumptions, hidden assumptions, and value assumptions in Ehrenreich’s argument? Does her argument contain any fallacies? If so, you need to identify them and explain how her reasoning is fallacious.

These questions are to guide and shape your evaluation of Nickel and Dimed. So, do not just respond the the questions in the order that I presented them. You are to construct your essay around these questions. Depending on your argument, your essay may not have to answer all of the questions.

Important Note:

Please understand that you are not presenting your opinion on low-wage employment/low-wage worker, but instead you are to present an argument that evaluates the effectiveness of Ehrenreich’s argument. In addition, you must use the critical thinking vocabulary to identify and analyze the different elements of critical thinking that pertain to this text.

Looking for this or a Similar Assignment? Click below to Place your Order Instantly!

%d bloggers like this: