Sign In

Corporate Social Responsibility: What’s the Big Deal?

SHAREHOLDER vs. STAKEHOLDER” DEBATE Name: Institutional Affiliation: Date: Shareholder vs. Stakeholder” Debate Currently several organizations are increasing the allocation of resources and activities to support their Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR). However the increase in expenditures on CSR activities remains consistent with organizations value maximization if compliment to their efforts to maximize their profits. In my view companies need to give back to the society through CSR activities an ethical procedure aimed at maximizing their values. Reference Doug Guthrie (2012). Paying More than Lip Service to Business Ethics. Retrieved From:
One of the most contentious debates among scholars has centered on the proper role for a corporation in the pursuit of its business. In large measure the debate has crystallized around two points of view. On the one hand, some believe that a corporation’s chief responsibility role is to make and maximize profit. This belief has often been referred to as the Friedman Approach in homage to the economist, Milton Friedman. Friedman espoused the view that as long as a corporation stayed within the rules, its only responsibility was to return the maximum profit to its shareholders. On the other hand, other scholars have asserted that the social responsibility for a corporation extends beyond just making a profit and includes a responsibility to act in a manner that promotes and supports the welfare of society at large.

What do you think about this so called “Shareholder vs. Stakeholder” debate? Do you have any personal experiences where you have observed the effects of this debate in terms of corporate actions? On which side of the argument do you come down on and why?

Looking for this or a Similar Assignment? Click below to Place your Order Instantly!

%d bloggers like this: